<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>23rd World &#187; Bad Behavior</title>
	<atom:link href="http://23rdworld.com/category/bad-behavior/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://23rdworld.com</link>
	<description>Home of Seattle-based web site designer and blog consultant, Mahalie Pech.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:22:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Kill is Your Friend</title>
		<link>http://23rdworld.com/2008/01/17/kill-is-your-friend/</link>
		<comments>http://23rdworld.com/2008/01/17/kill-is-your-friend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 03:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mahalie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bad Behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[configuration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[httpd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[httpd.conf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lamp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mod_rewrite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penguins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rewrite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sites-enabled]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://23rdworld.com/2008/01/17/kill-is-your-friend/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, slowly I am earning my beans in Ubuntu land. Tonight I had my first legitimate need to use kill and even found out what a PID number was and EVEN read my LOG FILES!! Wow. If you&#8217;re just learning Apache admin stuff and just can&#8217;t reload or restart your web server, head on over [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, slowly I am <a href="http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=4157550#post4157550">earning my beans in Ubuntu land</a>. Tonight I had my first legitimate need to use kill and even found out what a PID number was and EVEN read my LOG FILES!! Wow. If you&#8217;re just learning Apache admin stuff and just can&#8217;t reload or restart your web server, head on over to /var/log/apache2 and check out your error.log file. You prolly shouldn&#8217;t randomly kill .pids but if you&#8217;re getting a repeated httpd error like mine: &#8220;httpd (pid 5347?) not started&#8221; it could be that the server was manually shut down (oops, old Windows debugging tactic) and the process just needs to be murdered.</p>
<p><code>kill 5347</code></p>
<p>Worked like a charm. Another hint for you fellow newbs&#8230;maybe reading an Apache admin book would actually SAVE you time, eh? All I needed to do to enable my dern rewrite was to change AllowOverride None to AllowOverride all in my sites-enabled config. Hmmm&#8230;.I bet a quick doc on configuring sites in Apache2 would have saved me all that. But then I wouldn&#8217;t have ever found out <a href="http://www.terminally-incoherent.com/blog/2007/10/05/how-to-kill-stuff-on-linux/">how to kill stuff on linux</a>&#8230;so then again, maybe it was all worth it.
</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/pureevilbunny/1102170080/"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1424/1102170080_60595cd77e.jpg" title="psycho penguins" /></a><br />
<br /><small>Awesome drawing by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/pureevilbunny/">pure evil bunny</a> on Flickr.</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://23rdworld.com/2008/01/17/kill-is-your-friend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t use Main Street Host for Web Hosting!</title>
		<link>http://23rdworld.com/2007/10/12/dont-use-main-street-host-for-web-hosting/</link>
		<comments>http://23rdworld.com/2007/10/12/dont-use-main-street-host-for-web-hosting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mahalie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bad Behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accessibility (SEO)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://23rdworld.com/2007/10/12/dont-use-main-street-host-for-web-hosting/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Someone just called me at work about &#8220;Main Street Host Dot Com&#8221;. Now, whether that&#8217;s mainstreethost.com or main-street-host.com or mainsthost.com, whatever. They telemarket, so they obviously can&#8217;t make money by offering good/fair service. Don&#8217;t use them. And as long as I&#8217;m on a rant about crappy web hosts, if you want to procrastinate whatever it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone just called me at work about &#8220;Main Street Host Dot Com&#8221;. Now, whether that&#8217;s mainstreethost.com or main-street-host.com or mainsthost.com, whatever. They telemarket, so they obviously can&#8217;t make money by offering good/fair service. Don&#8217;t use them. And as long as I&#8217;m on a rant about crappy web hosts, if you want to procrastinate whatever it is you&#8217;re doing and have a laugh read this account of <a href="http://blog.dreamhost.com/2007/10/10/robbing-your-customers/">Lunapages</a> misguided insertion of link farms on their customers&#8217; 404 pages. The comments become puerile and ranty. In fact, I haven&#8217;t seen such childish bantering since 1996 bbs flame wars. </p>
<p class="warning"><strong>2009.03.09 Update</strong> Since this rather random little post continues to get a lot of traffic and comments, I thought I&#8217;d offer some useful links on SEO <small>[via <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5161867/top-10-tools-for-your-blog-or-web-site" title="read the article Top 10 Tools for Your Blog or Web Site">Lifehacker</a> 2009.02.28]</small>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/software/seo/getting-to-done-seo-made-easy-138429.php">Lifehacker&#8217;s SEO Made Easy</a> &#8211; covers a diverse range of search engines</li>
<li><a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/whitehat-seo-tips-for-bloggers/">Whitehat SEO tips for bloggers</a> &#8211; by Matt Cutts, the search quality manager at Google</li>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/152444/geek-to-live--have-a-say-in-what-google-says-about-you">Having a Say in What Google Says About You</a> &#8211; by Lifehacker&#8217;s editor, a step-by-step guide if it&#8217;s just your good name you&#8217;re looking to get out there with your site</li>
</ul>
<p class="warning"><strong>2009.10.26 Update</strong> I have noticed that a lot of the relatively few pro-MSH and most of the name-calling rude comments are coming directly from mainstreethost.com IP addresses. I try to occasionally post their IPs publicly when I find this. Note however, it&#8217;s very easy to use a proxy server to fake your IP address so any comments could be by MSH employees and I would not be able to trace it. I am not saying they have zero happy customers, but I would caution that based on simple statistics so far, to use a healthy dose of skepticism while reading the following comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://23rdworld.com/2007/10/12/dont-use-main-street-host-for-web-hosting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AOL &#8211; Bad News All Around</title>
		<link>http://23rdworld.com/2006/08/22/aol-bad-news-all-around/</link>
		<comments>http://23rdworld.com/2006/08/22/aol-bad-news-all-around/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 00:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mahalie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bad Behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geek News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://23rdworld.com/2006/08/22/aol-bad-news-all-around/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 photo by optovox on Flickr, check out his giant fish art bike made with recycled AOL CDs!
There&#8217;s much ado about AOL (formerly America Online) these days.  Blogs have been buzzing for weeks about AOL&#8217;s recent security blunder &#8211; publicly releasing over search records on 650,000 users, which evenutally resulted in their CTO&#8217;s resignation [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="photo by optovox on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/optovox/37100957/"><img alt="box full of aol cds - bad, but not as bad as their actual service" id="image80" src="http://23rdworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/08/aol_cds.jpg" /></a><br />
<small> photo by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/optovox/37100957/">optovox</a> on Flickr, check out his <a title="art bike made with recycled AOL cds" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/optovox/39010061/in/photostream/">giant fish art bike</a> made with recycled AOL CDs!</small><br />
There&#8217;s much ado about <a title="read more about AOL on the online encyclopedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America_Online">AOL</a> (formerly America Online) these days.  Blogs have been buzzing for weeks about <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/06/aol-proudly-releases-massive-amounts-of-user-search-data/">AOL&#8217;s recent security blunder</a> &#8211; publicly releasing over search records on 650,000 users, which evenutally resulted in their CTO&#8217;s resignation which was widely reported this morning.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;If you are an AOL customer, I feel sorry for you.&#8221; says Michael Arrington in his article in early August, <em><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/06/aol-proudly-releases-massive-amounts-of-user-search-data/">AOL Proudly Releases Massive Amounts of Private Data</a></em>, and continues, &#8220;AOL is hitting bottom when it comes to brand image. This story comes on the heels of the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIVZ9b0RgmY">recorded phone call</a> with customer service  disaster as well as a <a href="http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/business/columnists.nsf/techtalk/story/A0F7FD49EFA6565A862571BF006C005A?OpenDocument">just-in story</a> about a woman who is unable to cancel her deceased father’s AOL account, nine months after his death.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>As if that weren&#8217;t enough, I recieved<a href="http://www.dreamhoststatus.com/2006/08/22/aol-forwards-to-be-disabled"> notice through my webhost</a> this afternoon that an email alias I set up for a friend (so email @theirdomain.com could be forwarded to their AOL account) wouldn&#8217;t work anymore because AOL&#8217;s technologically stunted anti-spam measures automatically block all of Dreamhost&#8217;s IP addresses because they don&#8217;t target only the original spammers.</p>
<p>This is just another slap in the face, as far as I&#8217;m concerned. In August of 2005, America Online settled with the office of NY Attorney General Eliot Spitzer over complaints about how arduous AOL made it to cancel service. Consumerist posted <a title="aol never wants you to leave" href="http://consumerist.com/consumer/exclusive/aol-retention-manual-revealed-188005.php">AOL&#8217;s Retention Manual</a> that instructs it&#8217;s customer service reps on how to make it difficult for people to unsubscribe. Before that there was their preposterous email tax idea where you pay them to ensure your doesn&#8217;t get tossed in the spam bucket.</p>
<p>I was suprised to find only 28,000 hits for the literal string &#8220;<a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=%22i+hate+aol%22&#038;start=0&#038;ie=utf-8&#038;oe=utf-8&#038;client=firefox-a&#038;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official">i hate aol</a>&#8221; on Google. I searched for &#8220;<a href="http://www.google.com/search?hs=xlJ&#038;hl=en&#038;lr=&#038;safe=off&#038;client=firefox-a&#038;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&#038;q=%22i+love+aol%22&#038;btnG=Search">i love aol</a>&#8221; and was shocked to see almost 26,000 results&#8230;but then I started reading some and many turned out to be satirical citing reasons like &#8220;an endless supply of coasters&#8221; and I  Love  AOL  =  I  Love  &#8216;All  Outdated  Logic&#8221;.<br />
Related:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AOL">AOL</a> on Wikipedia &#8211; company history, major events and general info</p>
<p><a title="AOL resignations over security blunder" href="http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/technology/tech-media-aol.html?_r=1&#038;oref=slogin">AOL Chief Technology Officer Resigns</a> &#8211; New York Times</p>
<p><a title="summary includes related AOL stories on TechCrunch" href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/21/heads-roll-at-aol/">Heads Roll At AOL</a> &#8211; TechCrunch</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,125772-page,2/article.html">The 25 Worst Tech Products of All Time</a> &#8211; PCWorld Magazine (guess who&#8217;s number 1!)</p>
<p><a title="where to send your AOL cds" href="http://www.nomoreaolcds.com/">No More AOL CDs</a> &#8211; a website that collects AOL CD&#8217;s with plans to dump them at AOL headquarters when they reach a million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://23rdworld.com/2006/08/22/aol-bad-news-all-around/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bloggers &#8211; Update WP now!</title>
		<link>http://23rdworld.com/2005/08/19/bloggers-update-wp-now/</link>
		<comments>http://23rdworld.com/2005/08/19/bloggers-update-wp-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2005 19:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mahalie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bad Behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://23rdworld.com/?p=24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;ve been quite a few reports about sites getting hacked, blogs and otherwise.  &#8216;Spykidz ownz you&#8217; is what you&#8217;ll see on many such sites.  All the more reason to update to the latest and greatest in WordPress &#8211; currently 1.5.2.  It addresses security issues, specifically xmlrpc.php, which seems to be the leak.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;ve been quite a few reports about sites getting hacked, blogs and otherwise.  &#8216;Spykidz ownz you&#8217; is what you&#8217;ll see on many such sites.  All the more reason to update to the latest and greatest in WordPress &#8211; currently 1.5.2.  It addresses security issues, specifically xmlrpc.php, which seems to be the leak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://23rdworld.com/2005/08/19/bloggers-update-wp-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unrealized CSS Selectors</title>
		<link>http://23rdworld.com/2005/05/18/unrealized-css-selectors/</link>
		<comments>http://23rdworld.com/2005/05/18/unrealized-css-selectors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 06:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mahalie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bad Behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.23rdworld.com/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just finished reading the Selectutorial.  (Actually, I&#8217;ve read it before but my CSS skills were not developed enough at the time to make any of it relevant enough to me to remember.)  I must say, now that I fully understand it, it&#8217;s an different sort of excercise in frustration.  Why?  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just finished reading the <a href="" alt="a clear and concise explanation of various css selectors">Selectutorial</a>.  (Actually, I&#8217;ve read it before but my CSS skills were not developed enough at the time to make any of it relevant enough to me to remember.)  I must say, now that I fully understand it, it&#8217;s an different sort of excercise in frustration.  <em>Why?</em>  <strong>There are a lot of really, really useful CSS selectors that can&#8217;t be used.</strong> At least, not on a client&#8217;s site.  With every new selector my excitement would build, until the summary: &quot;&#8230;<em>not</em> supported by Windows Internet Explorer 5, 5.5 and 6, but are supported by most other standards-compliant browsers.&quot;
<p>Think child selectors, adjacent sibling selectors, attribute selectors and the :before and :after pseudo-classes are just for CSS geeks?  They could be regular part of your web-design diet, simplifying things like adjusting spacing conditionally depending on whether an element is right next to another.  I could have used the attribute selectors to make only my little &#8216;off-site link&#8217; images inline for a recent site instead of applying a class in the structural code to every freggin image tag! </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame that the worlds richest software company, fueled with hiring power and a presumably very well-educated and/or skilled workforce can&#8217;t make their browser standards compliant.  If it wasn&#8217;t for Internet Explorer&#8217;s bad but predominant browser, things could be so much more efficient for everyone.  Though I&#8217;ve applauded the relative dissapearance of &quot;This site is best viewed in&#8230;&quot; statement, I think I would now welcome &quot;Best viewed in a standards compliant browser (<strike>Internet Explorer</strike>, try <nobr><a href="http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/" title="get your standards compliant browser today!">Firefox</a> ).</nobr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://23rdworld.com/2005/05/18/unrealized-css-selectors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
